Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

2na fisherman

(143 posts)

8. Protection from future lawsuits or indictments?

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Tue Oct 28, 2025, 09:06 PM

Tuesday

But I don't think an NDA can legally quash future testimony under oath about the commission of illegal acts. Such an agreement is a contract but it can't be binding if the contract refers to illegal acts or a conspiracy to conceal them. Any lawyers out there?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

orangecrush eppur_se_muova

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Exclusive: US military officials required to sign NDAs tied to Latin America mission, sources say [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Tuesday OP

Total BULLSHIT!! bluestarone Tuesday #1

This is how Corporate warfare in the 21st century is run n/t Cheezoholic Tuesday #2

The best use of those NDAs would be for PH to stuff the paperwork in his mouth. littlemissmartypants Tuesday #3

Consciousness of Guilt 2na fisherman Tuesday #4

Agreed Bayard Tuesday #5

So if you refuse you get reassigned and not murdering people? Grins Tuesday #6

If military leadership is ordered to keep secrecy isn't that it. Buddyzbuddy Tuesday #7

I thought the whole idea of NDAs vis a vis the Presidency slightlv Tuesday #9

It seems to make common sense, but I have no Buddyzbuddy Yesterday #10

Protection from future lawsuits or indictments? 2na fisherman Tuesday #8