Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

FBaggins

(28,612 posts)

13. Declining to grant cert is usually quite fast.

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #3)

Mon Dec 8, 2025, 09:40 PM

Monday

It's just one of scores of cases that failed to make the cut.

As for "When the BASTARDS want to"... if they had wanted to they could have taken the case and upheld it... which would set a national precedent. This limitss it to the 5th circuit.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Cognitive_Resonance

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US Supreme Court turns away appeal of Texas library book ban [View all] BumRushDaShow Monday OP

Thought Police 2na fisherman Monday #1

Disgusting. SunSeeker Monday #2

See they CAN rule fast. bluestarone Monday #3

Declining to grant cert is usually quite fast. FBaggins Monday #13

The 1st Amendment doesn't exist to dictate what books libraries have to carry. cstanleytech Monday #4

Very true. reACTIONary Monday #6

ABSOLUTELY NO books should be banned for ANY fucking reason. Initech Monday #5

No exceptions? Polybius Monday #8

OK maybe not absolute. Initech Monday #9

Well this is something the voters are the ones with the power to change by just voting other people into office. cstanleytech Monday #11

The books aren't banned they are just not in the library which is a different issue. cstanleytech Monday #10

They removed books about flatulence? DBoon Monday #7

Maybe it was Donald Trumps autobiography? cstanleytech Monday #12