Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

oldmanlynn

(891 posts)

7. Why not have the judge review those documents or get a neutral party to review those documents and as long as the victim

Reply to JT45242 (Reply #3)

Fri Jul 3, 2026, 08:55 AM

Jul 3

The judge can appoint a neutral person to review those documents to make sure just the victims names are redacted and then as soon as she got that version of it, just have her release it. To act like only Trump and DOJ and FBI are allowed to break. The law is ludicrous.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Escape duckworth969

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ declines to turn over additional Epstein files, says redactions were appropriate [View all] riversedge Jul 3 OP

Congress passed a law requiring that the files be released. . love_katz Jul 3 #1

To fascists with no regard for the law, it's always an option, especially if they aren't afraid of being held Karasu Jul 3 #19

Then arrest and jail somebody! 31st Street Bridge Jul 6 #30

Well, gotta say, their reluctance to come clean and show all tells you all you need to know. calimary Jul 3 #2

do you think they released the most damaging files? rampartd Jul 6 #27

Will a judge actually put all of them including mango Mussolini in contempt? JT45242 Jul 3 #3

Why not have the judge review those documents or get a neutral party to review those documents and as long as the victim oldmanlynn Jul 3 #7

They might as well put it in neon lights: TRUMP IS NAMED IN THE FILES. Vinca Jul 3 #4

Start suspending counsels' bar licenses. flvegan Jul 3 #5

do more than that moonshinegnomie Jul 3 #12

Seems like contempt of court, to me (nt) muriel_volestrangler Jul 3 #14

For anybody else, but, not when protecting the rapist billionaire republianmushroom Jul 3 #17

Over and over and over again...Some of these judges need to see the inside of a jail as well. travelingthrulife Jul 4 #21

The Judge's order hasn't been violated. onenote Jul 6 #35

"the materials include sensitive victim information". Botany Jul 3 #6

They will never release the Epstein files. Trump will start a nuclear war 1st. Botany Jul 3 #8

Why would any judge in the US Old Crank Jul 3 #9

What would be next step when the main law enforcement agency refuses to enforce laws? mdbl Jul 3 #11

What is needed.... whyzayker Jul 3 #10

Upside down Whip-poor-will Jul 6 #31

Exactly duckworth969 Jul 6 #33

No one is above the law. right, wink wink chuckle chuckle ha ha Ha Ha republianmushroom Jul 3 #13

Ruh roh... 2naSalit Jul 3 #15

The DOJ declines? Bayard Jul 3 #16

Why doesn't ABC write "DOJ refuses" or "DOJ failed to.."? Yet another softball headline.about Trump criminality lostnfound Jul 5 #23

See post #35. onenote Jul 6 #36

What bullshit orangecrush Jul 3 #18

Where are the arrest warrants? Or can we all just ignore court orders now? travelingthrulife Jul 4 #20

See post #35. onenote Jul 6 #37

What is this "decline" shit? IL Dem Jul 4 #22

Right? ck4829 Jul 6 #25

Wrong. See post #35. onenote Jul 6 #38

This cover-up is almost as bad as the job market. What are they hiding? ck4829 Jul 6 #24

Trump is mentioned in the files more times than Jesus is mentioned in the Bible Blues Heron Jul 6 #26

I guess Trump is guilty, guilty guilty. But he's got to protect his "friends" Walleye Jul 6 #28

It was an order, not a request. C_U_L8R Jul 6 #29

See post #35. onenote Jul 6 #39

Thanks for setting us amateurs straight :-)) C_U_L8R Jul 6 #40

So what they are saying is 'trump'.... sheshe2 Jul 6 #32

Is it a dictatorship yet? Stacey Grove Jul 6 #34