Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

ancianita

(42,832 posts)

5. So what tone would you prefer -- critical tone? explanatory tone? panic tone? informational tone?

Reply to LearnedHand (Reply #3)

Thu Feb 6, 2025, 08:47 PM

Feb 2025

After all that's happened in the last 17 days, it's a bit late, maybe even irrelevant, to bother about tone.
If you don't like the writing style, ignore it.

Headlines aside, OP's usually prioritize content over emotion. Just sayin'.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Again. Who's got the nuclear codes? [View all] ancianita Feb 2025 OP

By now the codes are probably all over the place. Think. Again. Feb 2025 #1

Here's Who Has the "Nuclear Football" MrWowWow Feb 2025 #2

Cute. Thanks, good parrot, ChatGPT! ancianita Feb 2025 #4

JFC why the "advisory" tone of this piece LearnedHand Feb 2025 #3

So what tone would you prefer -- critical tone? explanatory tone? panic tone? informational tone? ancianita Feb 2025 #5

I'm referring to how The Atlantic seemed to be moving toward being the opposition LearnedHand Feb 2025 #6

I see. The Atlantic isn't writing specifically for Musk. It's our 2nd oldest magazine with a much broader audience. ancianita Feb 2025 #7