Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,046 posts)
1. Back in '88 I was taking some ed psych classes.
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 08:11 PM
Apr 2025

Because I could take them before formal admittance to a teacher's ed program. (Which, of course, I never actually applied to.)

One of the things that the two young dissertating grad student/instructors pointed out was that we knew how to teach reading to kids. There were piles of studies showing what worked, what worked well. Then they pointed out that very few districts or states actually taught reading that way--that we spent all kinds of money on ed research, but what was political and trendy, pandering to some sort of preferred emotional or empathetic methodology, was glossy and slick and had publisher support was followed, not what used controls and had explicit protocols and well-defined data collection methods with a focus on reproducibility and rigorous analysis to make sure they were testing what they thought they were testing.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Teaching Kids to Read: Ho...»Reply #1