Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

(36,966 posts)

1. It pays to read 5-10 paragraphs to see what's being asserted.

Tue Jun 3, 2025, 03:40 PM

Jun 3

I'd argue that the consistent thing in both opinions is that neither of the two branches should add to what the law says.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court: Agency Deference Is Good Now [View all] Passages Jun 3 OP

It pays to read 5-10 paragraphs to see what's being asserted. Igel Jun 3 #1

Sounds interesting. elleng Jun 3 #2

Worst court since Dred Scott. Old Crank Jun 4 #3

Judges should not make policy. The Mouth Jun 4 #4