Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

valleyrogue

(2,249 posts)
6. It isn't "back," and it isn't "traditional."
Tue Jun 10, 2025, 11:05 AM
Jun 10

The 1950s "nuclear family" was an aberration.

The fact is more and more women are rejecting marriage and kids because they simply don't want them. The economy has nothing to do with it. More than a few young men are pissed off because they aren't getting the sex and the free chores around the house like their fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers did.

Just because many men "want" it back doesn't mean they will EVER get it. They won't--ever.

The ship sailed fifty, sixty years ago. The economy won't allow it anyway.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The "traditional family" ...»Reply #6