Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

In reply to the discussion: ai is stupid [View all]

sl8

(16,832 posts)
3. Which AI did you use? Google's says "53 years old", based on a Rolling Stone article.
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 12:38 PM
Sep 4

Searching Google for "average age of rock stars performing concerts" (without the quotes) yielded this AI Overview:

While the prime age for a rock musician can range from their late teens to early 30s, the average age of performing rock stars is significantly higher, with a Rolling Stone report from 2019 placing the average age of the world's biggest live artists at 53. This is due to the enduring careers of legacy artists like Bruce Springsteen (69) and the Rolling Stones (75), whose consistent presence in top-grossing tours drives up the average age for performing rock stars.

[...]



The source Google gave for that paragraph was this article in Rolling Stone:

https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/features/average-age-biggest-live-artists-53-rising-863337/

The Average Age of the World’s Biggest Live Artists Is 53 — and Rising
Meanwhile, the average age of the biggest recorded music acts is moving in the other direction. What's going on?

By Tim Ingham

July 26, 2019

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»ai is stupid»Reply #3