Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Massachusetts

Showing Original Post only (View all)

sl8

(16,675 posts)
Tue Mar 21, 2023, 08:48 AM Mar 2023

Residents' Right to Be Rude Upheld by Massachusetts Supreme Court [View all]

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/17/us/massachusetts-public-meeting-discourse.html

Residents’ Right to Be Rude Upheld by Massachusetts Supreme Court

In an age of division, the court ruled that towns could not mandate polite discourse at public meetings. One official called the decision “very dispiriting.”

Louise Barron and her husband, Jack, filed a lawsuit after she was threatened with removal from a Southborough Select Board meeting in December 2018 for criticizing the board. Credit... Sophie Park for The New York Times

By Jenna Russell
March 17, 2023

In a decision that jangled the nerves of some elected officials, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last week reaffirmed a basic liberty established by the founding fathers: the right to be rude at public meetings.

The ruling sent waves of consternation across the state, where many local select board and school committee members have emerged battle-scarred from the coronavirus pandemic and its fierce disputes over masks, vaccines and remote learning. Stemming from a lawsuit filed against the town of Southborough, Mass., by a resident who said selectmen had silenced her unlawfully, the decision pushed back against attempts to mandate good manners.

“On its face it’s very dispiriting,” said Geoff Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association, which until last week had been nudging towns to develop civility guidelines for meetings. “Will it encourage the very few, very vocal individuals whose goal is to be disruptive? The S.J.C. is saying that’s the price of true freedom of speech.”

[...]

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Residents' Right to Be Ru...»Reply #0