Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(57,609 posts)
6. It isn't primarily a search bot. Its primary use is fraud, so the users can pretend to have knowledge and
Mon Jun 9, 2025, 04:27 PM
Jun 9

skills they don't have, whether with writing, coding, art or music.

I'm not aware of any popular AI tool including those used at universities that was legally trained only on public domain and/or properly licensed work. That's a fantasy. The theft of the world's intellectual property by robber barons is the ugly reality that AI fans don't want to talk about. OpenAI even admitted in court filings that training on what's in the public domain wouldn't be adequate, and the AI companies have also made it clear it would have been too much trouble and would have taken too long to get permission to use copyrighted work. And they've also made it clear that they don't intend to pay for training data they stole.

It's blatant theft. One of the greatest thefts in history. It's unethical to try to ignore it.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Ohio»Ohio university says all ...»Reply #6