Men's Group

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)

29. every time I have seen - or said myself- "poor fella" was in response to men

Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:03 PM

Sep 2013

Last edited Sun Sep 15, 2013, 05:55 PM - Edit history (1)

chiming in to make a thread (about an issue women take seriously) about their own manly concerns- and thus completely avoid the OP.
If you haven't noticed how frequently that happens- then you haven't been paying attention. I got so fed up with it, I replied "I don't fucking care" every time I saw a man do this in a thread about women''s issues. I'm guessing I did that about 40 times in three days and got on a dozen ignore lists. Because if any of these guys actually cared- they'd say or do something with their own damned threads. It's kind of obvious it's a game. And while you are at it, give Valerie Solanas a rest, one crazy person from 40 years ago guys doesn't have jack shit to do with real life.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Looking for examples of misandy on DU. [View all] Pab Sungenis Aug 2013 OP

17,400 Major Nikon Aug 2013 #1

I dunno, but "poor menz" has 16,000 google hits at DU. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2013 #2

I'd be happy with just a consistent application of such definitions Major Nikon Aug 2013 #5

Here's the strange loop, boiled down to its core: Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #6

calling out a person for derailing and disrupting a thread is misandry? bettyellen Sep 2013 #27

I dunno, you'll have to give me a link. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #28

every time I have seen - or said myself- "poor fella" was in response to men bettyellen Sep 2013 #29

I would describe a man who responds "every time" to women's problems with "I don't fucking care" lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #30

I'm not about to apologize for being fed up with bullshit derailing. The men who do that ought to bettyellen Sep 2013 #31

Here, in this forum, it's not derailing. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #32

the posts you brought up by Googling whatever were not all here- we were discussing bettyellen Sep 2013 #33

"I don't fucking care" doesn't need context. It is fairly unambiguous. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #34

Nonsense. None of care about all things equally- and we all know of people who are full of bettyellen Sep 2013 #35

Unfortunately, most of the comments lauding the "brilliant Swiftian satire" of V. Solanas are gone. Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #3

And real issues, as usual, take a backseat to personal beefs. No matter what "side" you're on. nomorenomore08 Aug 2013 #7

I don't know if anyone has noticed Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #8

Good idea. Probably for the best to wait it out on the sidelines. nomorenomore08 Aug 2013 #9

Not nearly everyone. RiffRandell Aug 2013 #10

You mean, without the "nearly" qualifier? You may be right, actually... nomorenomore08 Aug 2013 #11

I'd imagine that the destruction of Meta Hayabusa Aug 2013 #4

I would say this qualifies... opiate69 Aug 2013 #12

"These male minds" doesn't mean "*all* male minds" though. I wasn't particularly offended by that nomorenomore08 Aug 2013 #13

I'm sort of curious what OTHER group of humans (in ANY context) it would be acceptable to make a Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #14

Her confidence was obviously justified. n/t lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #15

Yeah. Here's an interesting thought experiment: Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #16

All I can think of in that subthread is.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2013 #17

Whoa..that definitely qualifies.. Upton Sep 2013 #18

Chah! lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #19

Oh yeah.. I saw that hide... I was kinda flabbergasted, honestly... opiate69 Sep 2013 #22

DU would hear about it for a year, at least. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #20

Aint that the fuckin truth opiate69 Sep 2013 #21

Yeah, nobody ever said the rules weren't enforced selectively here. nomorenomore08 Sep 2013 #24

If someone came up with some concrete examples- like, ones that didn't come from 10 post trolls, or Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #25

I agree. Completely unacceptable even if intended as "light-hearted." nomorenomore08 Sep 2013 #23

Certainly, anger is a justifiable reaction to the story in that OP. No question. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #26

I've noticed a shift. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2013 #36

There are people here who want to eliminate this group.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2013 #37

Some folks look for answers, others look for fights. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #38

I'd add to that, but try as I might, I can't think of a fitting noun that rhymes with "socks". lumberjack_jeff Oct 2013 #40

How about "crocks"? RiffRandell Oct 2013 #46

Heh. +1 lumberjack_jeff Oct 2013 #47

If a man among you, got no sin upon his hand... opiate69 Oct 2013 #41

What more can be said? lumberjack_jeff Oct 2013 #42

Especially when he goes to his own sanctuary... opiate69 Oct 2013 #43

No shit! Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #45

I can tell your future, oh, just look what's in your hand Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #44

here Doctor_J Oct 2013 #39

That poster is my age, actually several years younger, and I know how younger folks' worldview nomorenomore08 Oct 2013 #53

Ok, which one of you is Emelina? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2013 #48

Are you serious? HappyMe Oct 2013 #49

Not in thread itself ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2013 #50

Oh, okay. HappyMe Oct 2013 #51

I think, um... Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #52

Ah...a black flag op. Could be plausible if we as a gender weren't so fucking stupid Doctor_J Oct 2013 #54

And, just so the echo chamber is better informed... opiate69 Oct 2013 #55

Misandy coyotespaw Oct 2013 #56

Umm, most of the anti-gun posts in the Gungeon? Eleanors38 Nov 2013 #57