Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Can we have a discussion on this article? [View all]lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)30. Absolutely.
        There's a strong correlation between abuse of kids, or growing up in an abusive household and subsequent abusive behavior in adulthood (which strengthens the need to address the entire spectrum of violence, even if it is just mom slapping dad around without apparent physical injury.)
You're absolutely right about the likelihood of injury, the link I provided shows how much more likely a woman is to be injured in a reciprocally violent relationship.
I'm not sure that the pay gap was an issue that the author touched on, but I will note that "similar" is not "the same". There are similarities between gardening, farming and logging, but they are not the same thing and I wouldn't expect rates of pay to be comparable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							56 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        Honestly, yes. I have no real ulterior motive here. Just noting the problematic aspects of the MRM.
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #2
      
        
        Then why the provacative, disrepectful title?  Why not the title of the article?
        Behind the Aegis
        Dec 2013
        #3
      
        
        Their ideas do have influence, though, mainly but not exclusively on conservatives.
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #7
      
        
        I hope you're right. My point of view may not be quite as optimistic though.  n/t
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #10
      
        
        I think, rather than focusing on a movement, all cases must be argued based on individual merits
        Bonobo
        Dec 2013
        #5
      
        
        Not much, on that particular subject. But to me the article is less about custody cases per se
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #12
      
        
        You do realize that the 2nd wave feminist movement was mostly white females, yes?
        Major Nikon
        Dec 2013
        #25
      
        
        Those are all legitimate issues. Which is why I wish more men's groups would actually *address* them
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #29
      
        
        I wasn't referring specifically to college enrollment ratios. I see that as relatively minor
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #33
      
        
        I can't disagree with that. And like I said, we can certainly help boys without hurting girls.
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #35
      
        
        There is some truth to that, but feminism is too large and complex to really have one "direction"
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #41
      
        
        Okay, in that respect you have more of a point. But I still think you're oversimplifying a bit.
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #44
      
        
        Point taken. Though while there may be "two different feminist groups" there are many more than two
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #47
      
        
        I'm pointing out that there was a major divergence in mainstream feminism ideology
        Major Nikon
        Dec 2013
        #50
      
        
        Gotcha. I agree with the general observation even if I may quibble with some interpretations of it.
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #53
      
        
        Lurking out here, I notice "fathers rights activist" is a generic expression
        Eleanors38
        Dec 2013
        #15
      
        
        They're mostly political and social conservatives. Mostly white, but religion and social class I'm
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #16
      
        
        Perhaps I was mistaken, then. As I said, if anything only the most extreme should be seen that way.
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #27
      
        
        Of course. But as I said, that's largely a red herring for some of these groups.  n/t
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #26
      
        
        How about we teach everybody, at a young age, not to be violent to people they supposedly love,
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #28
      
        
        I know the pay gap is one thing we've sort of agreed to disagree on, and that's fine.
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #31
      
        
        The Ledbetter Act was a return to the status quo which had existed for many years
        Major Nikon
        Dec 2013
        #36
      
        
        Or simply that said "public policy solutions" aren't complex enough to address the issue.
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #38
      
        
        "Very little in Column B"? I don't really see how this issue is simple enough for such definitive
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #40
      
        
        If you can point to a single pay gap study that contradicts this, please let me know
        Major Nikon
        Dec 2013
        #42
      
        
        I think it's less a matter of direct gender-based discrimination, and more of ingrained cultural
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #45
      
        
        That's why I was suggesting that parental leave shouldn't be implicitly stigmatized and punished
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #49
      
        
        Which is one reason why, as I said, such a thing as "perfect equality" may not be possible or even
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #52
      
        
        Understood. I'd just like to see more flexibility for new parents and less unreasonable demands
        nomorenomore08
        Dec 2013
        #55
      
        
        Solving the economic issues isn't really all that hard and is largely gender neutral
        Major Nikon
        Dec 2013
        #56