Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Was this really necessary? [View all]Buffalo Bull
(138 posts)21. Free throught and free speech are always pretty
        I would have hoped that when it comes to censorship the forum would error on the side of adult participants being able to use well placed language that may not be pretty.
When speaking of SCOTUS and gay marriage,If I were to say.
"Social conservatives eager to claim the cloak of decency, attempt to make straight men's skin crawl but bringing up homosexual acts. Look inside the court to find what makes my skin crawl. When it come to decency ,Scalia is the cocksucker".
I may offend you, it may be entirely vulgar. Such a statement may brand me as not fit for DU. Yet it may relfect Scalia well in the contex that it is used. Thus it is political speach and shoud be allowed by adults.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							91 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
        
        i like sigmasix.  he is a thinker.  i can always appreciate that in agreement or not. nt
        seabeyond
        Apr 2013
        #5
      
        
        I don't want to continue this debate, because it has no bearing on the article in question
        seabeyond
        Apr 2013
        #12
      
        
        I have made an official complaint against this group, History of Feminism, in ask the admins forum
        quinnox
        Apr 2013
        #16
      
        
        I had one yesterday where someone was following a DU member around throwing a quote from one of
        Warren DeMontague
        Apr 2013
        #34
      
        
        I think if you want to reply to a post that contains the words "lately"
        Warren DeMontague
        Apr 2013
        #90
      
        
        Surprisingly enough, the "examples" of "sexism and misogyny" mostly seem to be, instead,
        Warren DeMontague
        Apr 2013
        #52
      
        
        Ahh... but you see, apparently the sock thing was all an innocent misunderstanding..
        opiate69
        Apr 2013
        #60
      
        
        Her "research" and groups affiliated with her have been repeatedly promoted on DU
        Warren DeMontague
        Apr 2013
        #37
      
        
        Most of us do that. For instance, I am a staunch supporter of choice, reproductive freedom, equality
        Warren DeMontague
        Apr 2013
        #68
      
        
        Yeah, I'm supposed to be one even though I'd never heard the term until people complained about it.
        Warren DeMontague
        Apr 2013
        #73
      
        
        I remember a story in the early 80s about someone's friend who was a very blissed out
        Warren DeMontague
        Apr 2013
        #83
      
        
        Exactly. But logical fallacies abound on DU, particularly in certain corners.
        Warren DeMontague
        Apr 2013
        #87