Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Poverty

In reply to the discussion: Putting a Face on Welfare Spat [View all]

oysterbay

(15 posts)
1. Yes, the rules are mond-boggling
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 03:48 PM
Apr 2013

Recently I was reading a similar post which led me to a Michigan state website with the guidelines, and they are complicated, confusing, convoluted, and the compliance process (crossing the t's and dotting the i's) is onerous.

There are minimum time requirements, certain activities are required, certain activities are allowed (qualify as meeting certain requirements), some activities are not allowed (may be helpful to reaching self-sufficiency but are not counted toward meeting requirements), some may be used to fulfill Column B requirements but not Column A requirements. Some activities are a Core Activity, some are not. Working at a menial dead-end job (job experience!) is valued more highly than going to school to learn a valuable skill. You have to be a highly trained bureaucrat and think very imaginatively to make sense of it all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Putting a Face on Welfare Spat [View all] question everything Oct 2012 OP
Yes, the rules are mond-boggling oysterbay Apr 2013 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Poverty»Putting a Face on Welfare...»Reply #1