Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,447 posts)
1. HYDROGEN SHOT: Water Electrolysis Technology Assessment - CONCLUSION
Sat Dec 7, 2024, 06:24 PM
Dec 2024
https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/hydrogen-shot-water-electrolysis-technology-assessment.pdf
CONCLUSION

The use of water electrolyzers for hydrogen production will be critical to meeting DOE’s Hydrogen Shot goal. This technology assessment pulls from numerous resources to summarize the current state of the field in terms of cost, commercial and manufacturing readiness, performance, lifetime, and deployment, while highlighting opportunities for advances through RDD&D across several different types of electrolyzers: PEM, LA, O-SOEC, AEM, and P-SOEC.

With well-focused, sustained investments in RDD&D, and based on specific scenarios integrating with renewable and/or nuclear power generation, the three most commercially mature electrolyzer technologies—PEM, LA, and O-SOEC—show the potential to achieve the Hydrogen Shot goal and realize an LCOH of $1/kg within a decade. In the longer term, the two lower-TRL technologies—AEM and P-SOEC—have potential advantages over these three with successful further technology developments. The techno-economic analysis conducted here utilized technical inputs from a number of sources referenced throughout this document, using published electrolyzer technical targets. It is based on clean energy scenarios representing the current grid, current clean energy resources, and future projections of hybrid clean energy systems. Other factors that influence cost, such as the sale of byproducts or the Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit (45V), were not considered in this analysis but could further reduce the LCOH.

The five electrolyzer technologies included in this assessment are on different technology development timelines and at different levels of commercialization. Furthermore, the different technologies will be more competitive in some end uses and with certain clean energy resources than others. With government and industry projections of significant growth in demand for clean hydrogen for multiple end uses, it is likely that there will be viable and important roles for all of these technologies. And with such a diverse array of applications for hydrogen across multiple sectors, each with their own particular needs, it appears unlikely that only one or two electrolyzer technologies will completely dominate the market.

The key RDD&D opportunities to achieve the Hydrogen Shot goals can be bundled into three main areas: technology advancements, manufacturing and economies of scale, and clean energy system integration. Efforts in all three areas are needed; innovations in one alone will not be sufficient to reduce the cost of hydrogen to $1/kg. Achieving the Hydrogen Shot goal will require a strategic allocation of resources and efforts across these areas. DOE’s Hydrogen Program, as well as the Hydrogen Interagency Task Force, are well positioned to address these broad RD&D needs to enable cost-effective, clean H2 production in the years to come, and to play an important role in achieving national climate and energy goals.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»DOE Releases Assessment o...»Reply #1