Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights

yonder

(10,107 posts)

4. Good to see this. If pursued I hope it is sustained.

Reply to douglas9 (Original post)

Fri May 26, 2023, 03:25 PM

May 2023

"Meant to accommodate private grazing operations in grizzly habitat"

(ON PUBLIC LAND)

Too often private grazing interests pay their Animal Use Month (AUM) lease fees and think they have carte blanche exclusive control to the use of those leased public lands.

Is the forage on that rangeland valuable? Probably. Can you expect depredation of your livestock? Probably, and that is the risk you are going to have to take for the use of that land.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court Overturns Federal Authorization to Kill 72 Grizzlies Near Yellowstone [View all] douglas9 May 2023 OP

Wow... 2naSalit May 2023 #1

Sadly, it can still be appealed to the SC Nictuku May 2023 #2

True... 2naSalit May 2023 #3

Good to see this. If pursued I hope it is sustained. yonder May 2023 #4