Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kag

(4,175 posts)
3. Thanks for posting this.
Sat Jun 16, 2018, 05:50 AM
Jun 2018

I never knew about this decision, but it's a good one.

True story: Since my daughter was in about second grade she seemed to understand instinctively that "forcing" children to recite the pledge of allegiance was a form of indoctrination. (Of course she didn't use those words back then.) Her reasons had to do with having kids recite words that they quite literally did not know the meaning of. To this day (she just turned 20) she talks about trying to start a movement--actually, if it were up to her it would be codified in law--to stop schools from having organized recitations of the pledge until and unless the kids are taught the meaning of the words, and then teaching them that it is voluntary to do so.

I'm looking forward to telling her about this decision.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Happy 75th anniversary, W...»Reply #3