Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)

3. I'm confused.

Reply to beevul (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 12:08 AM

Feb 2016

We're constantly lectured that the 2A is about keeping the militia equipped but then we're told military grade weapons in the civilian marketplace are a bad idea.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Legal decision casts doubt on Maryland’s assault weapons ban [View all] branford Feb 2016 OP

Amazing. beevul Feb 2016 #1

I'm confused. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #3

But they aren't any more military grade than a 9mm Barretta Press Virginia Feb 2016 #4

I saw that, too. Eleanors38 Feb 2016 #6

We should ban 9mm Barrettas or, as the military calls them, the M9 Press Virginia Feb 2016 #5

The standard of review TeddyR Feb 2016 #2

Uh oh. This case destroys a whole lot of anti... beevul Feb 2016 #7

Isn't it intriguing that the state contradicted itself by arguing both that Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author beevul Feb 2016 #9

Indeed. beevul Feb 2016 #10

Link to the GD "non gun" thread about this. beevul Feb 2016 #11

While NY US Court of Appeals used "intermediate scrutiny" to uphold NY & CTs ban. jmg257 Feb 2016 #12

The old saying... beevul Feb 2016 #13

Strict scrutiny certainly should apply TeddyR Feb 2016 #15

And all you hear is crickets from the gun control extremists Lurks Often Feb 2016 #14