Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(75,418 posts)
15. For The Non-Golfers On This Thread
Sat Nov 15, 2025, 07:02 PM
Nov 15

An 83 is not a terrible score, but it is at a professional golf tournament.
And, one does not hit "a lot of great shots" but shoot 13 over because of "bad spots". Unless of course she has a VERY substandard short game and us a bad putter. So, there's an element of delusion in her assessment.
Finally there are a few hundred collegiate golfers who could have played better on that sponsor exemption, but the sponsor wouldn't have a token worth future favors.
Finally, collegiate golfers with potential for their respective pro tours are already world class at 18. Maybe not best in the world level, but world class. World class golfers with nothing on the line don't shoot 13 over par.
We have people on this thread castigating others for being critical. But, my critique is based on golf.
From purely a golf perspective, she didn't belong in that field.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Kai Trump shoots 13-over ...»Reply #15