Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Outdoor Life

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 11:27 PM Feb 2014

There's no 'sport' for wildlife in one-sided competition [View all]

This discussion thread was locked by ManiacJoe (a host of the Outdoor Life group).

As the 2014 Olympic Games in Sochi approach, physically superior performances come to mind in anticipation of athletic excellence rewarded with gold, silver and bronze medals.

The definition of “sport,” according to Wikipedia, is a fair competition in games that involve two or more participants, which is governed by standards, rules and customs to determine a winner.

Hunting is clearly a game to hunters, but it should never be called a “sport,” when gun-packing humans track, find or simply wait for defenseless prey to come along, then shoot it with bullets or arrows, not giving it an even-handed chance to win the game.

Some hunters say the prey’s odds of escaping are its chance at defense and survival, but that contention wouldn’t hold up if arbitrated under the fair rules of any sporting game.

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/16336589-hunting-cowardice-theres-no-sport-for-wildlife-in-one-sided-competition
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Locking. ManiacJoe Feb 2014 #1
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Outdoor Life»There's no 'sport' for wi...»Reply #0