Religion
In reply to the discussion: The Guardian, Sept. 9,2010: Thank God (and Richard Dawkins) I'm no longer an 'angry atheist' [View all]trotsky
(49,533 posts)Explain what kind of speech is acceptable from an atheist, in your opinion.
Point to specific posts and clarify what is wrong about them, and how they could be better expressed.
Because instead, you just come off as attacking every atheist posting less-than-glowing opinions about religion. And that's exactly why you are getting the response you are.
We are allowed to speak too. We are allowed to voice our opinions on religion too. Believers don't get a monopoly on discourse.
And given that the "nones" (those with NO religious affiliation) are now the largest voting bloc in the US, I think we deserve more respect.
So keep judging and blaming and trying to silence critics of religion if you must - but understand that you, too, could be alienating Democrats.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):