Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,044 posts)
17. Well, that's because
Wed Jan 30, 2019, 06:30 PM
Jan 2019

they're bronze and iron-age solutions that are totally pointless in an Information-Age society.

I mean, that's the attitude people had 1000 years ago, we're more evolved than them.

Except that while a lot of things have changed, people haven't much. They just pride themselves on assuming that they must be the pinnacle of creation (or a telic version of evolution). That means insights, even those 3000 years old, are still valid.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hey be fair now. trotsky Jan 2019 #1
Metaphorical Jesus has all sorts of advantages Major Nikon Jan 2019 #2
Metaphorical Jesus Smokes Marlboros! MineralMan Jan 2019 #5
He can't be a god because he doesn't smoke the same cigarettes as me. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #8
But see, you can follow his lead... MineralMan Jan 2019 #10
then tell him to get off your cloud lol nt msongs Jan 2019 #13
Hi MineralMan - You make a very good point. Pendrench Jan 2019 #3
As you say, those ideas are standard in most cultures. MineralMan Jan 2019 #7
Agreed Pendrench Jan 2019 #12
Well, that's because Igel Jan 2019 #17
Ideas are not worthy just because... NeoGreen Jan 2019 #4
You have convinced yourself... MineralMan Jan 2019 #6
Only after scruplous reflection. (nt) NeoGreen Jan 2019 #9
Of course! MineralMan Jan 2019 #11
I knew it! NeoGreen Jan 2019 #14
LOL! MineralMan Jan 2019 #15
The problems are essentially the same. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #16
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Christianity - Bronze and...»Reply #17