Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,275 posts)
15. We can of course consider whether an appreciation of science...
Fri Feb 28, 2025, 03:56 PM
Feb 2025

...consists of breathless regurgitation of university press releases about say, batteries and hydrogen, or working as a scientist or as an engineer both on the level of laboratory research as well as in industrial settings. The latter, being on the front lines of science, requires, broad exposure to the primary scientific literature and hands on experience, the suspension of credulity, critical thinking, and the willingness to evaluate something called data beyond dogma.

The former, regurgitating press releases, requires not much more than credulity and wishful thinking.

I am often amused by people who claim to appreciate science but display a very low level of appreciation of what that enterprise involves. The famous Dunning Kruger conception is very often on display among this former set.

It's come to the fore in these Trumpian times, but regrettably it isn't limited to those on the right wing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As it's so dire, it's not amusing to see an antinuke quoting the two most pronuclear climate scientists in the world. NNadir Feb 2025 #1
I'm not "antinuke." OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #2
In my position, I hear a lot from people who tell me they're not antinukes who nevertheless drag out every idiotic... NNadir Feb 2025 #3
Simple questions OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #4
Spoken like a true "I'm not an antinuke" antinuke. QED. One might ask how long it will take the useless solar.... NNadir Feb 2025 #5
Who are you arguing with? OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #6
To your point around destruction of wilderness Pull_Left Feb 2025 #9
The first commercial nuclear reactor in the US was... NNadir Feb 2025 #10
Really appreciate the detailed response Pull_Left Feb 2025 #13
Let's not pretend that solar farms can only be built in the wilderness OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #11
Absolutely agree! Pull_Left Feb 2025 #12
Wherever and whenever they are built they will represent an unconcionable waste.. NNadir Feb 2025 #14
None of this is relevant to the OP OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #17
I certainly am very familiar with Jim Hansen and Pushkar Kharecha's work. I must have linked their highly cited... NNadir Mar 2025 #18
I should know better OKIsItJustMe Mar 2025 #19
Great post! Thanks for posting. Jim__ Feb 2025 #7
You're welcome OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #8
We can of course consider whether an appreciation of science... NNadir Feb 2025 #15
I have worked with several scientists, some of them I call friends. OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #16
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»James Hansen and Pushker ...»Reply #15