Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
DU Community Help
In reply to the discussion: Need advice on coping with single-issue flamers spammers. [View all]highplainsdem
(62,296 posts)52. I'm not moving the goalposts at all. This is the same objection I made when UTUSN posted about
that channel last week. WhiskeyGrinder put more emphasis on the inaccuracy and it being AI slop. But UTUSN didn't respond to anything I said about how objectionable those illos were. He kept talking only about AI.
This was my first reply to him in that thread:
UTUSN, that's the sleaziest AI slop channel I've seen, with thumbnail illos about rape, torture and perversion.
One of the premium "members only" videos is How White Men Bought Black Slave Wives in America (1810 Quadroon Balls).
What that channel is peddling doesn't appear to be history. The emphasis isn't history, anyway. It's emphasizing what's lurid and salacious.
If you want to learn about history, there are plenty of books and documentaries by real historians. No real historian would have anything to do with videos like those.
One of the premium "members only" videos is How White Men Bought Black Slave Wives in America (1810 Quadroon Balls).
What that channel is peddling doesn't appear to be history. The emphasis isn't history, anyway. It's emphasizing what's lurid and salacious.
If you want to learn about history, there are plenty of books and documentaries by real historians. No real historian would have anything to do with videos like those.
A friend I showed the video thumbnails to said they were porn.
Not sure I'd use that word, but I stand by what I said last week: What that channel is peddling doesn't appear to be history. The emphasis isn't history, anyway. It's emphasizing what's lurid and salacious.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yip, the no response has its message. The flamers go by the internet "rule" about the Last Word wins.
UTUSN
Mar 30
#11
I was unfamiliar with the thread, highplainsdem, and was replying in generalities.
LuckyCharms
Mar 30
#46
If you use "ignore," you will not regret it, IMO! Why let a few people annoy you and get in your head?
Doodley
Mar 30
#2
Absolutely perfect, am saving it. Would like to post it to the flamers but it might be called a personal attack.
UTUSN
Mar 30
#7
Am going to post it in Lounge, crediting you, in order to get it into my Journal. Thanks!
UTUSN
Mar 30
#12
My first impression of the WARREN resemblance was just the immediate impact of the face.
UTUSN
Mar 30
#36
Please see reply 18 to understand the thread UTUSN is complaining about others complaining about.
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#20
short of an alert (given they have actually demeaned or broken other rules) about your only alternative
stopdiggin
Mar 30
#6
Yip, doing that more than can like, reaping a pain in the gut and actual stress. Sometimes I dread
UTUSN
Mar 30
#8
Excellent and very understanding points. Back when, during the early Ignore era, tried it on bad actors.
UTUSN
Mar 30
#15
Yip, silently ignoring the stalking and lies until they expose themselves is satisfying when it happens.
UTUSN
Mar 30
#21
See reply 18 to understand the thread UTUSN is complaining about others commenting on. He was
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#22
I'm not going to ignore someone recommending an AI channel using illustrations of rape to advertise
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#30
Thanks for the understanding! - Insoluble because of my choices, but at least it's on record.
UTUSN
Mar 30
#17
UTUSN, you're apparently complaining about multiple people objecting to the lurid, non-historical content
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#18
And btw, if anyone here who's been sympathizing with UTUSN feels the replies he received in that
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#24
I use the Ignore feature because, for me, it's better not to know what's out there.
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 30
#26
Yip, I use a kind of Ignore - skipping. It's always been irritating when posters feel obligated
UTUSN
Mar 30
#28
Please see reply 18 and let me know if you think I was wrong for objecting to the content of the
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#31
Please see reply 18. UTUSN is unhappy that people objected to his reccing an AI channel with gross illos of rape,
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#33
The thread UTUSN is upset about wasn't primarily a debate about AI, either. It was about the inaccurate
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#39
I also pushed back on the inaccuracies ("100 vikings vs 10,000 Mongols," come on) and I think it's important to
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 30
#40
If what was posted was inaccurate then post an article or video with the correct info
questionseverything
Mar 30
#41
He was recommending an entire channel whose video thumbnails focused on rape, torture and
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#42
I just scrolled past thumbnails of hundreds of YouTube videos about Khan. None of them showed Khan raping
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#45
I'm not moving the goalposts at all. This is the same objection I made when UTUSN posted about
highplainsdem
Mar 30
#52