Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
3. This really isn't that surprising.
Sun Sep 14, 2014, 10:52 AM
Sep 2014

Last edited Sun Sep 14, 2014, 01:27 PM - Edit history (1)

The Dalai Lama is not like the Pope. He is not the head monk of Tibetan Buddhism. He is the head monk of the Gelugpa school. The fifth Dalai Lama was given by the Khan's the secular leadership of Tibet, think governor during the Roman Empire days, and the fused position has lasted until the Chinese invaded Tibet.

While in exile, the Tibetans formed an elected parliamentary government thereby rendering the secular role of the Dalai Lama null and void. He willingly vacated that position some years ago. There may be another Dalai Lama but he will not be the ruler of Tibet, he will just be the head monk of the Gelugpa school. There are spiritual leaders of the other schools as well. For example, the Kagyupa school has the Karampa who is married and lives here in the US. The Sakyapa school has H.H. the Sakya Trizin who is the 41st lineage holder in this ancient school, and he and his wife live in India with their two sons.

This Dalia Lama has shown deep ecumenism in his dealings with all of the major schools. He will be remembered as much as the great 5th one. The 5th created the secular leadership position for his people, and the 14th will have dissolved it for his people in exile.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Dalai Lama Sees No Need F...»Reply #3