Elizabeth Warren

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)

23. There wasn't an ounce of 'vitriol' in my reply.

Reply to MADem (Reply #19)

Sun Mar 22, 2015, 12:40 PM

Mar 2015

What there was was sardonic eye rolling.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Boston Globe Op Ed: Elizabeth Warren, run for the White House [View all] n2doc Mar 2015 OP

The author of that article is the Executive Director of MOVEON.ORG. MADem Mar 2015 #1

And you're a known Hillary supporter, so it's 'unsurprising' that you should hold your views. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #2

I didn't write an endorsement for the Boston Globe. Anna Galland did. MADem Mar 2015 #5

"had Barney Frank articulate her unwillingness" MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #7

Barney and Betsy are CLOSE. He wouldn't speak without her knowledge. MADem Mar 2015 #18

One of us doesn't know Barney very well MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #20

I know Barney--he'd remember my name. He'd remember my late grandmother better though. MADem Mar 2015 #22

All I can say is.. mountain grammy Mar 2015 #26

I want her to be Fed Chair. That's a job where she can really apply her particular skills MADem Mar 2015 #27

I want her to be the president choosing the fed chair. mountain grammy Mar 2015 #30

She'd have to reverse her decision for that to happen! nt MADem Mar 2015 #32

Ok, it's a 'fact'. So what? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #10

No--I am doing nothing of the sort. That's an unfair accusation. MADem Mar 2015 #13

Oh, sure you weren't.... Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #16

Wow. That's some vitriol, and it's not accurate. MADem Mar 2015 #19

There wasn't an ounce of 'vitriol' in my reply. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #23

Gee, ya coulda fooled me! MADem Mar 2015 #28

Apparently I did fool you. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #29

When you start your rant with "Here's a hint..." you're not being a cheery pal. MADem Mar 2015 #31

'Not friendly' is a far cry from 'vitriol'. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #33

You don't have to be foaming at the mouth to be vitriolic. MADem Mar 2015 #34

So let's look at what you've achieved. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #35

If you didn't call me names, I wouldn't be replying to you. MADem Mar 2015 #36

Really? Then let's fix that. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #37

Thank you--that will be lovely. nt MADem Mar 2015 #38

It's a pity that the post includes two articles not one RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #39

No slam on the Senator, but the Globe's endorsement doesn't mean what it used to mean. MADem Mar 2015 #40

No slam on you, MADem, but don't you think harassing EW supporters on this thread with RiverLover Mar 2015 #41

If you will note, most of my replies are to someone who repeatedly MADem Mar 2015 #42

And why does her organization want Warren to run? nt MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #3

I think the answer is in her article....? nt MADem Mar 2015 #6

Do you think she played some part in getting MoveOn to MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #9

Maybe you should ask her. I'd guess the answer to that is YES. nt MADem Mar 2015 #14

This is the Warren group, and we know that. djean111 Mar 2015 #4

What's wrong with telling people who the person is who wrote the article? MADem Mar 2015 #8

Again, why would you think we would not know that? djean111 Mar 2015 #11

It was news to me--I initially thought the writer was Globe Staff. MADem Mar 2015 #15

A lot of Warren supporters signed the MoveOn petition for asking Warren to run. Familiar with djean111 Mar 2015 #17

I took my email off her list--told her I'd be back in touch when she ran for Prez Demeter Mar 2015 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #21

But she is much more powerful and can get more done as a Senator. At least A Simple Game Mar 2015 #24

If she ran as a republican I would vote for her. L0oniX Mar 2015 #25