Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Time for Change [View all]Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)17. Agree 100%.
Time for fresh blood and fresher ideas. Neither of those candidates offer either. We need an FDR, someone willing (and able) to rattle the cages of Power and and take it back for the People.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

That is where I'm at. I'll fight with everything I have against hrc until she's
Doctor_J
Mar 2015
#3
If it helps, Doctor_J, just remind yourself that you're voting for a Supreme Court picker.
calimary
Mar 2015
#11
Then those that we oppose have already won. They don't have to do anything different
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#42
While the fear of Bush might explain some of it, it's also the fear of change.
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#6
We would have been better off rephrasing that fear of a R majority to hope that a Democratic
jwirr
Mar 2015
#18
Who is "pretending to be morally pure."? and how does that relate to the OP? nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#10
Means not being an amoral unprincipled fuck lacking all consistency as far as I can tell.
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#43
I disagree that most people are satisfied with their lot. I don't know what circles you
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#13
I agree. I didn't notice that my subject was the name of a previous DU'er until after I posted.
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#15
We do need another FDR but right now I would be happy with an Eisenhower. n/t
A Simple Game
Mar 2015
#24
THIS is the absolutely best thread I have seen in a long long time. Thank everyone who has posted.
jwirr
Mar 2015
#19
I'll jump on the band wagon as soon as an "electable" change candidate announces.
Fla Dem
Mar 2015
#20
Let me try to guess your point. Since most of us get paid from some corporation
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#27
It seems to me you are trying to find something in my post to be OUTRAGED about. n/t
1StrongBlackMan
Mar 2015
#29
Quite the contrary. Seems to me you were trying to rationalize that bribery
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#30
I think the risk is high for her. The Democratic Party Machine will back H. Clinton.
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#37
Yes, we need someone who is independent of the powers who currently run our country
Time for change
Mar 2015
#41