Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
6. Thanks, Koko.
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 06:28 AM
Jul 2015

Covington and Burlington was a job Holder got originally in 2001, after having served in government.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Holder

That firm uses its large number of former government employees to market itself. Its firm overview page is unusually brief--only four short paragraphs. https://www.cov.com/en/about-the-firm/firm-overview

Very prominent on the firm overview page, however, is a link to the firm's long list of professionals who worked for government. It lists them, not by what their job at Covington is, but by each of their government functions, so that, for example, Chertoff name appears more than once because he had more than one kind of government job. It's fairly clear that Covington is selling itself to clients and prospective clients as an influence peddler, as much as, or more than, it is marketing itself as a law firm.

Holder, whose face is currently on the first page of the firm's website, will be worth much more to them now than he was a just another asst AG.
https://www.cov.com/

Another example of one moving through the revolving door.

This post is largely to respond to the half truths I've already seen in GD that Holder is only going back to the job that he had before he entered government service, so what's the beef?


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Matt Taibbi: Eric Holder ...»Reply #6