Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(6,358 posts)
16. By all accounts, they didn't convince anybody in the courtroom including the Jury that there was
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:11 AM
Jul 2

any proof of sex trafficking and racketeering. That's the very definition of over charging. They never had a chance of getting guilty verdicts on those charges. The very short deliberation time makes it obvious that the jury didn't buy any of what the prosecution was selling on those charges.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The media will pay more attention to the verdict than they will Tribetime Jul 2 #1
Watching the fall of this creep as entertainment, unfortunately this MEDIA guided since I have no power on that front. Brainfodder Jul 2 #5
Guilty on two out of five charges Emile Jul 2 #2
You can't spell, murielm99 Jul 2 #3
to whom are you replying? WhiteTara Jul 2 #29
Original post. murielm99 Jul 2 #37
what was the misspelling? WhiteTara Jul 2 #42
I don't want to embarrass them. murielm99 Jul 2 #45
SMH DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2 #46
In DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2 #47
All is forgiven WhiteTara Jul 2 #48
Thank you. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2 #50
forgiveness is mine WhiteTara Jul 2 #51
Link Passages Jul 2 #4
He can still have freaky sex parties in prison milestogo Jul 2 #6
looks like his lifestyle will carry on, outside prison. WhiteTara Jul 2 #49
Convicted on 2 counts Acquitted on 3 Johnny2X2X Jul 2 #7
Not Guilty on Sex Trafficking of Casandra Ventura Prairie Gates Jul 2 #8
Obviously it pays to be rich Arazi Jul 2 #9
Exactly. I suspect a less privileged person of color Heidi Jul 2 #11
Highly unlikely. A less privileged person of color would almost certainly never have been charged with Racketeering Wiz Imp Jul 2 #13
Maybe because they couldn't afford to boss a group of 'assistants' Sparkly Jul 2 #14
By all accounts, they didn't convince anybody in the courtroom including the Jury that there was Wiz Imp Jul 2 #16
And that is a shame. Sparkly Jul 2 #18
Combs is a truly horrible, despicable human being. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #23
And OJ was never going to be convicted Sparkly Jul 2 #28
First result of a very quick Google search; Heidi Jul 2 #17
I didn't claim otherwise. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #20
I apologize for misunderstanding. Heidi Jul 2 #22
The evidence was in front of our eyes. Sparkly Jul 2 #27
And, people still don't believe women. Sparkly Jul 2 #12
And there are specific subsets of women Heidi Jul 2 #19
Billionaire justice TheProle Jul 2 #31
Doesn't look like he's going to prison BannonsLiver Jul 2 #10
He may get off with time served. murielm99 Jul 2 #21
What's more disgusting: 1st time offense; celebrity break; richie rich "justice"? UTUSN Jul 2 #15
Guilty on two counts... OmegaX Jul 2 #24
It was a terrible decision. Sparkly Jul 2 #26
Granted... OmegaX Jul 2 #30
Blame the prosecution MakeThemCry Jul 2 #34
Question? Was there some offense lesser than Sex Trafficking that they could have charged him with Wiz Imp Jul 2 #36
The facts did speak for themselves Sparkly Jul 2 #38
Why does it seem angrychair Jul 2 #40
Good question. Sparkly Jul 2 #44
He should get zero jail time Buckeyeblue Jul 2 #25
Apparently... TheProle Jul 2 #32
Yep angrychair Jul 2 #41
But he wasn't convicted of that Buckeyeblue Jul 2 #52
Exactly my point angrychair Jul 3 #53
Yep MakeThemCry Jul 2 #33
I just heard a point which I had forgotten about - but I think is dead on. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #35
And put him on staff MorbidButterflyTat Jul 2 #43
Don't worry. moondust Jul 2 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*** Breaking ***Verdict R...»Reply #16