Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Mountainguy

(2,145 posts)
7. Regardless of who or when warnings were issued....
Mon Jul 7, 2025, 03:00 AM
Jul 7

There would have been a much less tragic result had TX not allowed camps to house children in known flood zones.

Many of the cabins at Camp Mysic were sitting in a 100 year flood zone. Meaning that in any given year there was a 1% chance of them being flooded. If that flood were to come at night during a camp session....like it did on Friday....then the campers could be swept away before anyone knew what was going on. And that happened.

Had they been forced to relocate those cabins to higher ground, which is available on that property, they would have been much safer. And not only did they not do that, they decided to also house the youngest girls in the cabins at greatest risk.

Why is Texas allowing commercially operated facilities to house children in high risk areas?

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas officials, both sta...»Reply #7