Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Could Autism Be an Evolutionary Step Forward? [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(59,546 posts)52. Discussion is missing the obvious. For it to be evolutionary, there have to be children
Marriage rates of people in their 30s are about 65% for neuro-typicals and about 18% for autistic spectrum. I suspect that the autistic spectrum people have fewer children in those marriages too.
Six people are named in the OP.
Five never married.
Five never had children.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Yes, he came to mind. It may not always be positive but there are plenty of traditionally thinking people who are
Quixote1818
Saturday
#3
I believe it's probably a genetic mutation (in the scientifically neutral sense) that exhibits naturally
AZJonnie
Saturday
#4
You're right, classical evolutionary theory does focus on traits that improve individual reproductive success. However
Quixote1818
Saturday
#10
Civilization is where it is now because of people who "cover their ears and stim".
meadowlander
Sunday
#40
Autism is within the range of normal human variation and has always been with us.
meadowlander
Sunday
#39
Discussion is missing the obvious. For it to be evolutionary, there have to be children
Bernardo de La Paz
Monday
#52