Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SpankMe

(3,834 posts)
22. Trappings wasn't a good word, but I was struggling to make a point
Sun Jul 12, 2026, 07:11 PM
Sunday

I was trying to make parallels to, say, straight clergy who consciously chose to remain celebate and to not even date or seek physical companionship or even the company of a woman. This is a choice that they make for reasons of morality (and other factors) even though it goes against their nature as a heterosexual human capable of sexual impulses.

There are also voluntarily celebate straight people who - through religious or some other motivation or emotional condition - find any type of physical or sexual attraction repulsive and distasteful to the point where they live their whole lives completely sexless. In some cases, they won't even hang out alone with people of the opposite sex.

I'm saying that one possibility if Graham was gay is he may have been such an individual who was so guilty or self-hating or disdainful of homosexualty that he consciously chose to not to engender any aspect of it. No dating men, no sex with men, no hanging out socially with other gay males - no social or cultural traits commonly associated with gay men (which is what I meant by 'trappings'. Poor word, I admit.)

The controversial aspect of my hypothesis is that if he consciously suppressed all aspects of homosexuality in his personal life and lived no part of it, then his commentary (or votes) against LGBT interests wouldn't neccessarily be hypociritcal since he was not living, or enjoying, the things he was voting against (like when an anti-abortion lawmaker votes against abortion and then takes his teenage daughter two states over for an abortion).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Most people on our side of the aisle only found it amusing because he was a Republican and hung around with Vinca Sunday #1
Does it matter, realistically. In the grand scheme of things why do we care? Srkdqltr Sunday #2
I think it matters because public policy has real-world consequences. QueerDuck Sunday #4
Yes , but he's dead. Legacy is nothing. It will change over time. Even the most well known have their back story change Srkdqltr Sunday #6
Yes, he's dead. I already addressed that. The consequences of his actions did not die with him. QueerDuck Sunday #10
Agree 100 percent, QD... B.See Sunday #14
Now if someone steps forward with multigraincracker Sunday #28
The legislation he authored and voted for is on record. I think that's why it matters Torchlight 16 hrs ago #35
I care because I'm gay Random Boomer 18 hrs ago #30
I just figured the man was asexual . Dan Sunday #3
There were alleged male prostitutes that would disagree with that assessment mr715 Sunday #5
If he was gay he would've been a lot more outspoken against gay marriage biocube Sunday #7
While he may have been homosexual, he wasn't gay. David__77 Sunday #8
Are you being ridiculous or making a joke? ColoringFool Sunday #19
What an odd response. Random Boomer 18 hrs ago #31
Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't Sympthsical Sunday #9
There is a author I have read a bunch of his books Tree Lady Sunday #18
The guy from Cinepals, per chance? Hassin Bin Sober Sunday #23
HOW DID YOU KNOW?! Sympthsical Sunday #24
LOL Hassin Bin Sober Sunday #25
I love this pull from absolute left field Sympthsical Sunday #29
Somebody is going to cash in a write a book about being Graham's lover Fiendish Thingy Sunday #11
Does he have a "porn stash buddy"? QueerDuck Sunday #15
Here's my take, and it''ll be controversial SpankMe Sunday #12
His hypocrisy is the heart of the matter. mr715 Sunday #13
Your 3rd paragraph is quite illogical. If a gay politician...... ColoringFool Sunday #17
Trappings wasn't a good word, but I was struggling to make a point SpankMe Sunday #22
I get your point, I just disagree Random Boomer 18 hrs ago #32
It MATTERS because, I firmly believe, LG allowed himself to be blackmailed... . ColoringFool Sunday #16
I couldn't have cared less what his sexual orientation was. I don't care what anyone's sexual orientation is. Raftergirl Sunday #20
The whole thing is b.s. Being never married isn't an indication of anything. valleyrogue Sunday #21
Marriage is not a tell, either way Random Boomer 18 hrs ago #33
Then why hasn't there been any reliable reporting on it? valleyrogue 16 hrs ago #34
The way he talked confused homophobes. rickyhall Sunday #26
Omg..he was gay. evemac Sunday #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Advocate.com: Graham cons...»Reply #22