Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(167,409 posts)

8. The article is correct because

Reply to 70sEraVet (Reply #5)

Wed Feb 11, 2026, 08:13 PM

Wednesday

the GOP has done NOTHING to uphold the Constitution and has in essence, ditched Article I (which is THEIR BRANCH) to promote the "Unitary Executive" and elevate Article II. And their Constitutional disdain includes attacking the Article III Judicial Branch (threatening impeachments of judges and other retaliatory investigations) and sticking it to the states by ignoring the 10th Amendment.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

love_katz yliza

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House votes to override Trump's Canada tariffs [View all] BumRushDaShow Wednesday OP

What is with the idiot from Maine? Aren't they a border state? mdbl Wednesday #1

Maybe he's responding to some muscle mahina Wednesday #2

You're right. He is an idiot. He represents Maine's 2nd district which represents the... the nelm Wednesday #9

Especially since he is not running for re-election.....nt delisen Wednesday #3

Tariffs don't have to be a partisan thing Polybius Wednesday #7

I looking forward to the Smurf being assigned to a closet in the next term. Buddyzbuddy Wednesday #4

I have one suggestion concerning that article: 70sEraVet Wednesday #5

The article is correct because BumRushDaShow Wednesday #8

Looks like some are trying to un-tarnish their reputation before the next election. progressoid Wednesday #6

Awesome. Is it veto proof? What is it's likelihood of being enforced against an administration that defies judges? ChicagoTeamster Wednesday #10

No, it is not veto proof, and.... reACTIONary Wednesday #11