Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Raftergirl

(1,990 posts)

8. Why would anyone waste their money on these glasses?

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Wed Jul 8, 2026, 02:04 PM

13 hrs ago

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

purr-rat beauty SheltieLover

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Meta Is Toying With the Idea of Smart Glasses That Record Everything, All the Time [View all] highplainsdem 14 hrs ago OP

Is this the way of the future? RussBLib 14 hrs ago #1

It's more than a bit dystopian. I just added a paragraph about just how dystopian this might be to the OP. highplainsdem 14 hrs ago #4

Zuckerberg & masking tape Tasmanian Devil 14 hrs ago #2

He and other AI bros will do all they can to protect their own privacy. They just want to spy on us and highplainsdem 14 hrs ago #5

There's a market out there for technology that neutralizes this technology. jls4561 14 hrs ago #3

1 party consent and 2 party consent.. ExtraGriz 13 hrs ago #6

The problem with these "2 party consent" laws and Meta Spy Glasses... jmowreader 3 hrs ago #29

If you use these glasses and give them even johnnyfins 13 hrs ago #7

Why would anyone waste their money on these glasses? Raftergirl 13 hrs ago #8

have you SEEN what people will waste their money on? Skittles 13 hrs ago #10

Yes, unfortunately, Raftergirl 13 hrs ago #14

They shouldn't even be legal in the first place. Karasu 12 hrs ago #16

That's a bit far Polybius 6 hrs ago #22

We'll have to respectfully disagree on that, and I couldn't disagree more. Any potential positives of these things are Karasu 1 hr ago #34

a pox on everyone who has enabled that POS Zuckerberg Skittles 13 hrs ago #9

They already made that movie. hamsterjill 13 hrs ago #11

How will sensitive info be protected purr-rat beauty 13 hrs ago #12

What could possibly go wrong? Baitball Blogger 13 hrs ago #13

You mean like... jmowreader 3 hrs ago #30

Meta is Palantir levels of evil and shouldn't exist. I have no idea how so many people still justify using their Karasu 12 hrs ago #15

Glasses better have IR ... squiregeek 11 hrs ago #17

If someone shoves those glasses up Elon's rear end Wicked Blue 10 hrs ago #18

I think you meant Zuck Polybius 6 hrs ago #23

All these white billionaires look alike to me Wicked Blue 6 hrs ago #25

Pepper spray to the rescue. twodogsbarking 10 hrs ago #19

Citizens should trademark and/or copyright their faces so that when Zuck uses their likeness they can - in2herbs 8 hrs ago #20

You can't copyright your face jmowreader 3 hrs ago #31

Meta is just a bunch of perverts. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist 7 hrs ago #21

Hello Facebook users? luv2fly 6 hrs ago #24

They can F right off with that Bristlecone 6 hrs ago #26

Yet another reason I'm glad I'm a hermit Luciferous 6 hrs ago #27

The unanswered question: Why? Grins 4 hrs ago #28

Backin 2010, Zuckerberg said that privacy is no longer a "social norm". LudwigPastorius 2 hrs ago #32

lol, aside from being illegal in many states fujiyamasan 1 hr ago #33